Commemorating 25 Years: The Ezra Taft Benson
Agriculture and Food Institute
After 25 years of serving the people of the
world, the Benson Institute celebrates by reporting on
it's accomplishments.
*Where did it all start? Who first conceived an agriculture
and food institute at Brigham Young University? Some say
that the idea evolved from conversations among colleagues
in the College of Biology and Agriculture who wanted to
serve by sharing the results of their research with people
around the world. BYU’s extensive language resources seemed
to make it the perfect home for such a center.
As the Ezra Taft Benson Agriculture and Food Institute celebrates
its 25th anniversary, it is striving more than ever to fulfill
the mission, “to improve the quality of life of people throughout
the world.”*
An unusually large group gathered at the Brigham Young University
experimental farm in Spanish Fork, Utah, on 23 September 1975.
After a cow-milking competition and a dinner, Dallin H. Oaks,
president of BYU, made the anticipated announcement of a new
organization called the Ezra Taft Benson Agriculture and Food
Institute. The Institute would be organized to fight hunger
and malnutrition throughout the world.
Former United States Secretary of Agriculture Ezra Taft Benson
responded to this announcement by saying, “There is no pursuit
more worthy, no profession more noble than the labor of one
who provides food and clothing for his fellowmen. Throughout
the world—and I have seen most of it—there are vast resources
waiting to be used for the betterment of mankind. The objective
of this Institute is to use the human, physical, and spiritual
resources of BYU to help the people of the world help themselves
improve their quality of life. The Institute will be an agency
of experimentation whereby the agricultural resources of the
various lands can be evaluated, new technology applied, [and]
nutritional needs studied. Then, the beneficial results of this
research can be implemented.”
Lowell D. Wood: Starting Out Lowell D.
Wood became the first director of the Benson Institute. Former
chairman of BYU’s Department of Agricultural Economics, Wood
worked extensively with the farms and the agricultural loan
portfolios of the Welfare Services of The Church of Jesus Christ
of Latter-day Saints (the Church). With little more than office
space to start with, Wood knew that Ezra Taft Benson’s vision
for the Institute would require extensive amounts of work and
sacrifice. Wood spent his first months as director with D. Delos
Ellsworth, associate Institute director, working to establish
a board of directors, raise money, and define goals for the
Benson Institute. Some fledgling projects dealt with home storage,
home gardens, and small scale food canning—research done by
request of the Church Welfare Services. Another early endeavor
for the Benson Institute was Project Guatemala, a collaborative
effort with the Church and various departments at BYU to improve
the health, literacy, and nutrition of needy families in Guatemala.
During its first years, the Benson Institute was led to where
demand existed and funds were appointed. It became involved
in the Indian Assistance Program, which was intended to help
Native Americans throughout North America. Demonstration farms,
where research could be conducted, were built in many places.
These farms provided opportunities for Indians to learn improved
agricultural practices.
D. Delos Ellsworth: Branching Out Before
serving as associate director of the Benson Institute under
Lowell Wood, D. Delos Ellsworth taught real estate finance and
development at many universities, including Arizona State and
Texas Tech. He also served as a state legislator in Arizona.
After he assumed the position of director in 1978, the Benson
Institute continued sponsoring research on home gardens, food
storage, and canning but also began to branch out into other
agronomic and animal science research. One example of this was
the undertaking by Laren R. Robison, of BYU’s Agronomy Department,
and N. Paul Johnston, of BYU’s Animal Science Department, to
develop an integrated small scale crop and animal production
system that would help subsistence farmers become more productive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
the announcement of the Benson Institute, Ezra Taft Benson
(right) shakes hands with Max Wallentine, associate dean
of the College of Biology and Agriculture at BYU, who
was named to the board of directors, as Dallin H. Oaks,
president of BYU, looks on. |
John
Hill of BYU’s Food Science and Nutrition Department studied
the ability of various oil treatments on seed and grain
to repel insects during long periods of storage in homes
or on small farms. From left to right—Arthur Wallace,
N. Paul Johnston, John Hill, Frank Williams, Raymond Farnsworth,
Delos Ellsworth |
|
Local
participants in Guatemala planted gardens following instructions
developed by the Benson Institute during Project Guatemala.
|
|
Raymond
Farnsworth of BYU’s Agronomy Department was active in
the Benson Institute’s Indian Assistance Program. Peter
Deswood’s family were among the many that benefited. |
As financial resources became more available the Benson Institute
was able to expand into new areas. One such project taken on
by the expanding Institute was sponsored by Control Data Corporation
(CDC). CDC wanted to develop a computerized data base of technologies
appropriate for small scale agriculture, and the Benson Institute
provided them with the expertise and experience that was needed.
Table
for Home Vegetable Gardens: This
table, created by David Leatham, bases optimal distribution
of space for each vegetable on the size of the garden
(25, 50, 200 sq. ft.). |
| Garden Size |
25 |
50 |
200 |
| Zucchini |
2 |
5 |
5 |
| Carrots |
9 |
9 |
9 |
| Collards |
9 |
10 |
10 |
| Tomatoes |
2 |
19 |
19 |
| Lettuce |
- |
7 |
10 |
| Chard |
- |
- |
7 |
| Spagetti Squash |
- |
- |
4 |
| Cucumbers |
- |
- |
13 |
| Onions |
- |
- |
7 |
| Kohlrabi |
- |
- |
9 |
| Parsnips |
- |
- |
3 |
| Bell Peppers |
- |
- |
18 |
| Beets |
- |
- |
7 |
| Broccoli |
- |
- |
48 |
| Spinach |
- |
- |
5 |
| Hubbard Squash |
- |
- |
8 |
| Snap Beans |
- |
- |
18 |
| Yield |
$28.04 |
$48.84 |
$95.60 |
| Cost |
$11.72 |
$11.72 |
$11.72 |
| Profit |
$16.32 |
$37.12 |
$83.88 |
| Labor (Hrs) |
2.05 |
4.32 |
13.28 |
| Profit/Hr |
$7.96 |
$8.59 |
$6.32 |
Beside these projects, Benson Institute staff traveled and
worked constantly to form ties with government officials, particularly
ministers of agriculture in various countries including Hong
Kong, the Philippines, Egypt, and countries throughout Latin
America.
Laren R. Robison: The Small Scale Agriculture Model
Laren R. Robison was an associate dean of the College of Biology
and Agriculture at BYU when he became the director of the Benson
Institute in 1983. That year the extensive world travel of the
Benson Institute staff paid off when the Benson Institute signed
a contract with the government of Ecuador and the Pan American
Health Organization. This contract allotted $250,000 for the
implementation of the Small Scale Agriculture Model (SSAM) in
Ecuador. The SSAM was a model Robison helped develop and was
one part of a larger program, the Family Self-Reliance Program,
that taught families to use a small amount of land for production
at a level adequate for self-sufficiency, health, and economic
status improvement. The Institute began in Ecuador by building
two demonstration farms and working to teach SSAM techniques
to 10 families.
Through funding from CDC, the Benson Institute also completed
computer coursework that presented the major principles and
concepts for successful implementation of SSAM. Robison visited
Mexico, Bolivia, and Chile to talk with government dignitaries
about the possibility of implementing a SSAM system in those
countries. In 1987, an arrangement was made with the government
of Mexico to allow the integration of SSAM into the curriculum
of Mexico’s high school and university level institutes for
technical agriculture.
|
|
|
|
|
Randy
Christopherson helped complete work on the Small Scale
Agriculture Courseware Project, done collaboratively
by the Benson Institute and Control Data Corporation.
|
|
Delos
Ellsworth, right, poses with the Ecuadorian Minister
and Vice-Minister of Health after helping to close
a $250,000 contract with Ecuador’s government to implement
Small Scale Agriculture in Manabí, Ecuador. |
|
Cleria
Espinoza, a member of the Benson Institute staff, demonstrates
a solar oven, which can be used as part of the Family
Self-Reliance Program, to visitors at the Provo office
of the Benson Institute. |
The Benson Institute remained involved in many other projects
including the developments of a solar oven, a solar dryer,and
a small tractor. The Institute also sponsored research on vegetable
yields in response to irrigation frequency and quantity along
with investigations of dry-packing methods and other forms of
food preservation. Faculty exchanges between BYU and Latin American
universities were conducted. A team was sent to Cuauhtémoc,
Chihuahua, Mexico, to establish a canning plant at a local university.
Medical educators visited an Ecuadorian medical school to strengthen
its science curriculum. Some studies on fish farming were done,
and the results were implemented near Lake Titicaca in Bolivia.
With these and many other projects, it was clear that the Benson
Institute was beginning to live up to the expectations of its
founders.
James B. Jensen: A New SSAM
 |
Members
of the Benson Institute’s SSAM team in Pimpiguasí, Manabí,
Ecuador |
James B. Jensen came to the Benson Institute from the faculty
of microbiology and public health at Michigan State University
in 1989. His own background dealt with malaria research,
but he immediately saw the benefit that the SSAM could have
in the practices of subsistence farmers. Jensen therefore
decided to focus all of the Benson Institute’s efforts on
SSAM. Unfortunately, before Jensen arrived, the Benson Institute
lost its contract to implement SSAM in Ecuador due to a
change in the government. Without the money from the Ecuadorian
government contract, Jensen decided to completely renovate
the way that SSAM was disseminated. In the past, SSAM implementation
involved sending Benson Institute staff into villages to
work one-on-one with groups of 12–15 farmers. This strategy
was expensive because responsibility rested solely with
Benson Institute staff members. Working with the technical
agriculture schools in Mexico directly, however, had proven
successful and shown that educational institutions were
more stable than presiding governments. The Benson Institute
began to join forces with other colleges and universities
to set up programs where research, already being done by
students in the country, could benefit poor farmers in surrounding
areas. The Benson Institute also set up some experimental
farms and began to sponsor student research on topics related
to SSAM.
| Evaluation
of Small Scale Agriculture: These
tables were used in evaluation and implementation of
SSAM. The table on the left shows the amount of each
product produced and its use. The table on the right
shows the daily requirements per person for a set of
nutrients and the number of people that one SSAM farm
could support. |
| |
|
|
USE |
|
|
Daily
Reg. |
Persons |
|
| |
Product |
Total (kg) |
Family |
Animal |
Excess |
|
Nutrient |
per
Person |
Supported |
|
| |
Corn |
3769 |
1884 |
1043 |
842 |
|
Calories |
2300
kcal |
7 |
|
| |
Soybean |
571 |
--- |
571 |
--- |
|
Protein |
56 g |
14 |
|
| |
Drybean |
110 |
110 |
--- |
--- |
|
Calcium |
800 mg |
16 |
|
| |
Vegetables |
1213 |
440 |
--- |
773 |
|
Iron |
1 mg |
15 |
|
| |
Poultry |
225 |
123 |
--- |
102 |
|
Vit. A |
5000
IU |
22 |
|
| |
Eggs |
2800 |
2555 |
--- |
245 |
|
Thiamine |
1.4 mg |
15 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This form of work was more effective and required less manpower;
instead of setting up its own infrastructure, the Benson Institute
used established local university resources, including some
of the personnel. As a result, more people were affected because
of this increased involvement. Farmers accepted recommendations
more readily because they were coming from locals rather than
from outsiders. Most importantly, when university students and
faculty members were involved in helping their fellow countrymen,
they saw the importance of doing so and began to do beneficial
projects on their own. Thus, a program was born to teach people
to teach others, and a continuum for learning ensued.
A training center was established in Mexico to continue teaching
educators how to implement SSAM in their curriculum. The Benson
Institute also began working closely with CUNORI, an agriculture
college in Guatemala, and gave scholarships to some Guatemalan
students to do agricultural research with BYU faculty. A new
program was also started that taught English to those involved
in the various SSAM programs.
Paul Johnston: Developmental Research and Teaching
Paul Johnston became the next director of the Benson Institute
in 1994. His background in animal science, as well as his concern
for international development had involved him with the Benson
Institute and SSAM from its inception. During this time, he
had noticed that even when SSAM was tailored to a targeted community,
it did not always pose the best solution for a particular problems
faced by subsistence farmers in that area. Also, implementing
SSAM in an area meant a long-term commitment of resources to
that area. He felt that increased involvement was needed from
the local universities, as well as from BYU faculty and students.
Also, there was a greater need to research and identify the
problems in each community before developing specific solutions
to those problems. It would still be important that the students
go into the rural communities to teach subsistence farmers about
the solutions developed through their research, but these solutions
would be presented as individual projects rather than variations
on SSAM. This allowed more flexibility in research possibilities
as well as in the implementation of solutions. More faculty
members of BYU’s College of Biology and Agriculture became involved
due to the flexibility of working on projects tailored to their
specialties. It became easier for the Benson Institute to enter
and leave different areas, rather than being committed to one
place for a long period.
| Walipini Yields:
This table, from research by
Oscar Rodrigo Ayaviri, through the Benson Institute
in Bolivia, shows yield of various crops in a walipini,
a type of underground greenhouse, developed as a means
to grow nutritious vegetables on the harsh Bolivian
high plains. |
|
Depth of Walipini
(m) |
| Vegetable |
0.6 |
1.2 |
174.6 |
| Tomato |
156.9 |
150.4 |
174.6 |
| Red Pepper |
47.0 |
34.7 |
55.8 |
| Lettuce |
38.8 |
39.7 |
39.2 |
| Carrot |
10.5 |
11.5 |
12.3 |
| Radish |
3.8 |
4.2 |
3.5 |
| Beet |
66.0 |
65.7 |
67.7 |
| Parsley |
53.3 |
73.5 |
58.3 |
| Sugar Beet |
6.7 |
7.5 |
7.2 |
| Pea |
44.0 |
45.3 |
54.4 |
| Cabbage |
35.4 |
41.2 |
42.8 |
| Alfalfa |
25.8 |
39.3 |
37.5 |
| |
|
|
|
The newly refined focus took advantage of the educational community’s
inherent strengths of research and teaching. For those not accustomed
to international development work, this method sometimes seemed
less appealing. Changing many lives in one step, as the SSAM
was intended to do, was appealing; however, although it had
made a difference in many lives, it did not always work. Instead
of using one simple solution to solve problems of hunger, malnutrition,
and poverty of subsistence farmers worldwide, the new focus
on research and teaching admitted that there are no easy answers
to the problems faced by these farmers. The various research
projects undertaken by native students throughout Latin America
included diverse topics such as protein fortification of corn
tortillas with soybeans, crop production in underground greenhouses,
parasite frequency of certain populations, and investigations
of the nutritional habits of pregnant mothers and their small
children.
Soy
Fortified Tortillas: This
table, from research by Benson Institute-sponsored students
in Guatemala, is one example of an attempt to develop
and then test solutions to the problem of protein deficiency.
The students fortified tortillas with soy to increase
the protein content, and then measured acceptability
of the new recipes. |
| |
Acceptability (%) |
| % Soy in Tortilla |
Liked |
Disliked |
Neutral |
| 0 |
100 |
0 |
0 |
| 13 |
93 |
0 |
7 |
| 30 |
93 |
7 |
0 |
Common
Sanitation Practices:
This table, created by John Hill of BYU's Food Science
and Nutrition Department, summarizes a few aspects that
are researched in a community before the Benson Institute
begins implementing any project. |
| |
|
Practice |
% |
|
| |
Source of Drinking Water |
|
|
| |
|
Faucet |
79 |
|
| |
|
Well, Pond, or Stream |
21 |
|
| |
Water Purification |
|
|
| |
|
Unpurified |
50 |
|
| |
|
Chlorine Bleach/Boiling |
50 |
|
| |
Toilet Facilities |
|
|
| |
|
None |
11 |
|
| |
|
Outside Latrine |
40 |
|
| |
|
Inside Toilet |
49 |
|
| |
Sanitization of Dishes |
|
|
| |
|
None |
84 |
|
| |
|
Chlorine Bleach/Hot Water |
16 |
|
| |
Stove |
|
|
| |
|
Gas or Electric |
49 |
|
| |
|
Open Fire on Brick or Adobe |
51 |
|
| |
Animals in House |
|
|
| |
|
Cats and Dogs Only |
81 |
|
| |
|
Other Farm Animals |
19 |
|
| |
Kitchen Floor |
|
|
| |
|
Solid |
56 |
|
| |
|
Earth |
44 |
|
One other major step taken by the Benson Institute during Johnston’s
time as director was an innovative expansion into Africa in
1999. After much deliberation, Morocco and Ghana were chosen
as the two countries in which the Benson Institute would work.
Universities were selected in each country, and students were
selected to do research, just as had been done previously in
Latin America.
|
|
|
|
|
Mario
Calderón, Rolando Dugal, and (José) Genaro Pérez discuss
the optimal spacing of corn in order to increase crop
yields in Guatemala. |
|
Glaucia
Narváez and Sara Bentancourt (nutritionists) weigh a small
child in Limón, Guatemala, as a part of their nutritional
evaluation of children in the community. |
|
Jaycie
Fidel learns to make pots from villagers as she interns
in Okwenya, Ghana. |
The Future Innovative changes may occur
as a new director is appointed during the year 2001, yet it
remains certain that the Benson Institute will continue to seek
ways of improving the quality of human life through nutritional
and agricultural means. With the support of donors, the expertise
of BYU’s College of Biology and Agriculture, and the enthusiasm
of students very willing to serve, the Benson Institute enters
a new millennium of development and service. Ezra Taft Benson’s
vision sounds forth as people throughout the world are able
to better their lives through the assistance of the Benson Institute.
Top
|